Lauren Journet
Professor Shirk
Global Politics of Terrorism
25 February 2018
Motifs
and Motives
During
the early 1700s, the Golden Age of Piracy roared in popularity as pirates took
over ships and claimed fortune and followers. Towards the end of the 1700s, the
Reign of Terror took the lives of the noble and civilian alike. The early 1900s
and the Holocaust brought methods of eugenics and ethnic cleansing to an entire
country. Beginning with the Golden Age of Piracy and the Reign of Terror and
then shifting towards the Holocaust, there appears to be a theme with the
attacks that occurred across the globe. Not only are these three periods of
time examples of extraneous violence, but these incidents of terror also stem
from both political and economic motives.
The pirates came to power during the Golden Age of Piracy
from the years of 1716 to 1726. At this time, there was an expansion in trade
and commerce across the Atlantic Ocean, giving pirates access to valuable goods
on ships. At first glance, pirates seem like merely troubled criminals. But the
political effects of the time were paramount. The pirates were well acquainted
with their surrounding political circumstances. However, their knowledge of the
absolute monarchy did not mean that they respected its power. In fact, the
pirates directly rejected the monarchy. Being against trade meant being against
the empire. Even some of the more developed countries such as Britain, France,
Portugal, and Spain were not powerful enough to protect themselves from the
pirates (“Golden Age of Piracy”). They lacked the fleets and men necessary to
successfully regulate the pirates- another testament to the political
atmosphere of the Golden Age of Piracy. The more obvious motivations were still
present, and economics did play a large role in piracy. The pirates collected
immense riches while simultaneously wreaking havoc on the system of trade. The
pirates were stealing money and goods not only to make a statement but also out
of pure enjoyment. Most pirates associated their time on the ship with a
vacation from the normal life of poverty.
The Reign of Terror took place in France and lasted from
September of 1793 to July of 1794. During this time, there were about 16,594
death sentences in the country. While savage, these sentences were did not come
without warning. The political infrastructure in France was crumbling, with the
traditional absolute monarchy faltering. The leader at the time, King Louis
XVI, called the Etats-General into session for assistance and was shocked when
the assembly refused to disband until a new constitution was created. The
functions of the monarchy were then suspended, and the king and queen were held
prisoner before both being executed (“Marie Antoinette and the French
Revolution”). In The French Revolution and Early European Revolutionary
Terrorism, Mike Rapport explains, “Private citizens also had a part to
play, not least in offering denunciations and information on ‘suspects’”
(Rapport 68). Anyone who was suspected to support the nobility was executed
along with the king and the queen. This made up a great portion of the 16,594
death sentences. There were also outstanding economic difficulties in
France. The country was deep in their debts due to a series of wars fought and
financed alike, such as the Seven Years War. In addition, the noble paid little
to no taxes but spent excessive amounts of money living their lavish
lifestyles.
The Holocaust itself lasted from
roughly 1939 to 1941, but years of oppression and destruction preceded and
followed this timeline. Many people know this to be an era of time in which
mass genocides and killings were rampid, but there was much more that
contributed to the madness. The Treaty of Versailles, effective in 1920,
initiated the Guilt Clause, which labeled Germany as an aggressor of World War
One. This clause restricted the German army to 100,000 troops and resulted in
reparations for the country. The Nazi Party then ran on an anti-government
nationalist platform. After this, when Hitler came to power, he used politics
to spread the ideas of eugenics and the oppression of Jewish people. The Law
for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (1933) constructed a mass
sterilization program. The Blood Protection Law (1935) criminalized marital and
sexual relations with Jewish persons (“The Holocaust and World War II:
Timeline”). Hitler implemented these laws and used his political power to
isolate the entire groups of people, the Jewish population included. But this
maltreatment also stemmed from a deficient economic system. Germany’s state of
depression worsened following the Treaty of Versailles. The country was
crippled by debt and high unemployment after World War One.
The Golden Age of Piracy, the Reign of Terror, and the
Holocaust all claimed countless lives. On the surface, these attacks appear as
isolated incidents of violence. Spanning across nearly two hundred years, each
of the incidents shares a common trait. A closer examination of the three
attacks brings a theme of political and economic motives to light. This
understanding of the three incidents serves as an explanation for the use of
violence amongst three very different dominating powers- the pirates, the French,
and Hitler.
Works Cited
“Golden Age of
Piracy.” Notorious Privateers,
Buccaneers, Pirates and
Their Exploits, www.goldenageofpiracy.org/.
“The Holocaust and
World War II: Timeline.” United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
United States
Holocaust Memorial Museum,
www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007653.
“Marie Antoinette
and the French Revolution.” PBS,
Public Broadcasting Service,
Rapport, Mike. “The
French Revolution and Early European Revolutionary Terrorism.” The
Routledge
History of Terrorism, Routledge Publishing, 2015.
Just a heads up, I am having a lot of issues with formatting. Maybe Tuesday before class I can take a couple of minutes to show you what is going on from my end but the only way I could make this post visible was if I highlighted the background white and made the font a dark shade of red. If there are any issues I would be happy to email you a copy. In the meantime, I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
ReplyDeleteHi Lauren,
ReplyDeleteI may have a fix for you. Control a, go up to text color, go over to highlight, and select "none". Then copy and paste it back into here. This should do the trick.
I like how you clearly lay out the three cases you wish to use in the exploration of the topic. Maybe it would have been better to stick with just two of your favorite cases. Really focus on extracting as much detail out of the reading as you can to support your argument. If I am understand your argument correctly, you suggest that its not just the surface-level acts of violence in the middle of the event that we should focus on, but we should also look at greater societal trends, such as economics as well? Perhaps as more of a micro-behavioral level? Am I understanding this correctly?
-Dan
I think that your essay is laid out well, hitting the three time periods you stated in your introduction. I feel like your idea of deciding political/economic motive gets lost during some of the description of each time period. After some of your explanations of what time period we are looking at, I think a brief sentence that pulls us back to your thesis and stating if your going to be talking about economic/political motives for this time period would be helpful.
ReplyDeleteHey Lauren,
ReplyDeleteAnother formatting tip: I have been using Pages to write my posts and then I upload them to Blogger, but before doing so I reformat by using the font, text size, and style buttons at the top of the draft post page. I have been changing everything to the "normal" setting, and this seems to have worked for me!
On another note, I really enjoyed reading your blog post! We have been making connections between each case of potential terrorism in class, but I thought your attempt to draw more connections across the events helped reexamine each instance and form detailed links between seemingly unrelated events. However, at times I did feel that you included some summary that may have been more effective it were transformed into a distinct analysis of political and economic motives. Going off of Zoe's point, an easy fix for this would be to include a sentence or two linking your points within the paragraph back to the thesis.