The Ongoing Effects of Anarchist Terrorism
In the late 1880s a new wave of terrorism began to emerge: anarchist assassinations and bombings known as propaganda of the deed. While this violence was revolutionary at the time, it continues to motivate modern terrorist actions. From the anarchist violence of the late 19th and early 20th century to the Weather Underground Organization and Conspiracy of the Fire Nuclei today, not much has changed between the motivations and actions of these terrorist groups.
As the Federal Bureau of Investigation states, “Anarchist extremism in the U.S. encompasses a variety of ideologies, including anti-capitalism, anti-globalism, and anti-urbanization” (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2010). This rang true throughout the late 1880s and continues to be the spark that drives some terrorist actors today. The Weather Underground movement was a far-left group explicitly created to protest issues within the United States government, such as Vietnam War policies, racial discrimination, and growing corporate greed. Similarly, the Conspiracy of the Fire Nuclei aims to spread their anti-authority ideology through series of bombing attacks across their home country of Greece, likely stemming from the economic collapse and subsequent European Union bailout. Clearly the principles the FBI puts forth are not only applicable to the United States, but describe most anarchist terror movements across the globe since the 1880s.
The FBI also correctly explains that “The extremists are loosely organized, with no central leadership—although they occasionally demonstrate limited ability to mobilize themselves” (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2010). Weather Underground was made up of young adults, most of whom were college students, and never had an organized base for the FBI to directly target. They were a relatively small organization only capable of limited bombing attacks until their numbers grew. If this were achieved, they would then organize and launch a full revolution against the United States government. However, this expansion never occurred and most radicals gave up their revolutionary ideas and went on to live ordinary lives within the mainstream population (Eckstein, 2016). The Conspiracy of the Fire Nuclei works similarly: they have never been able to significantly harm their targets and have only garnered major attention for their mail bombing campaign in 2010. Acts of solidarity have been made in the group’s honor, but the decentralized nature of the organization prevents them from undertaking large-scale attacks that actually harm citizens or government officials (Keating 2010). While the group is still in operation today, they have significantly decreased in influence and threat, meaning that they too could reach the same fate of the Weather Underground movement.
Overall these two groups, and modern anarchist terrorism as a whole, demonstrate the same characteristics as the wave that occurred between the 1880s and the 1920s. Revolutionist ideology has the power to destroy the familiar system by which the majority of society is content with, automatically making them a substantial threat. While this form of terrorism is generally thought to be an isolated wave of violence which no longer impacts modern society, it clearly has a broader and deeper effect than originally noted. The primary goals of these organizations is to be heard by their respective governments and for meaningful change to benefit the groups they advocate for. David Rapoport believes anarchist violence began because “A ‘new form of communication’ was needed, one that would be heard and command respect” (Rapoport, 2002, 4). As in the case with Weather Underground and the Conspiracy of the Fire Nuclei, the members of each organization felt their voices were underrepresented or purpose ignored, so they resorted to violent tactics in an effort to garner attention for their causes. Brendan Chrzanowski of The Strategy Bridge analyzes this trend well; “it is too easy for groups such as the Conspiracy to get lost in the background. Allowing this might prove to be a costly mistake” (Chrzanowski, 2017). While the traditional wave of anarchist terror has ended, following this linear way of thinking alienates groups whose main goal is often only to be heard and represented.
Works Cited
Chrzanowski, Brendan. “The Conspiracy of Cells of Fire Resurgent.” The Strategy Bridge, 15 Aug. 2017, thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2017/8/15/the-conspiracy-of-cells-of-fire-resurgent.
Eckstein, Arthur M. “Weather Underground Changed the World, Even As It Fell Apart.” Time, Time Magazine, 2 Nov. 2016, time.com/4549409/the-weather-underground-bad-moon-rising/.
Keating, Joshua. “What do we know about the Conspiracy of the Fire Nuclei?” Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy, 4 Nov. 2010, foreignpolicy.com/2010/11/04/what-do-we-know-about-the-conspiracy-of-the-fire-nuclei/.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation. Anarchist Extremism: A Primer. 16 Nov. 2010, archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/november/anarchist_111610/anarchist_111610.
Hi Brenna,
ReplyDeleteOverall nice essay. I wish you brought in Stampnitzski or Tilly as they address terror as a tactic. It was clever to address domestic terrorism both in the United States as well as Greece, using the FBI framework. You raise a good point that even though we may think about waves of terror like Rappaport suggest, anarchism, for lack of better expression is not dead.
I do have a question, in the opening you suggest that anarchist in the 1880's were "anti-globalist". I think this is a stretch, Historically the world was in the first stage of the second wave of industrialization. and it was not until the eve of World War One where we had a high level of integration. (It was higher then, compared with today).
-Dan
Thanks for the feedback, Dan! I will definitely try to incorporate more of the first few readings of the semester into my future essays. You are correct with the anti-globalist point you bring up; that was not something I originally caught when writing my post. Moving forward I will try and make sure I explicitly address all parts of a quotation and clarify points that may not align with the instance I am describing.
DeleteHi Brenna,
ReplyDeleteThis was a very interesting essay. I am a little confused however in certain parts. You start off talking about the Weather underground group and how they are a left wing group but never explicitly link them to anarchism. Also when you start your conclusion saying that "these two groups...", I did not know exactly what you were talking about because the Conspiracy of Fire Nuclei was briefly mentioned and did not note it as an important factor.
- Zoe
Thanks for the comment, Zoe! While the Weather Underground Organizations itself does not reference anarchism as a core value, the FBI and other intelligence organizations consider it to be an anarchist faction within the United States because of their extreme leftist ideology. While this may not be a perfect example, the goal of my essay was to show that anarchism as a general way of thinking is far from extinct and continues to pose a threat to both American and global ways of life.
DeleteHey Brenna,
ReplyDeleteRight off the bat, your essay catches my eye. Comparing anarchist violence of the from the 19th and 20th century to the Weather Underground Organization and Conspiracy of the Fire Nuclei today is bold, but well argued throughout your essay. I found it interesting that you discussed the motivations behind the two, noting some similarities. Not sure if you saw, but my essay was also about similarities between motivations. There is only one thing I suggest would make this essay stronger. In your concluding paragraph, you state, "While this form of terrorism is generally thought to be an isolated wave of violence which no longer impacts modern society, it clearly has a broader and deeper effect than originally noted." Diving into those deeper effects could lead to more discoveries! Another great essay overall!
Thanks for the feedback, Lauren! I did read your essay and thought it was great that we had similar ideas about the topics we have discussed in class so far! I definitely agree that continuing to explore the deeper impacts of the established waves of terrorism could bring some very interesting class discussions and interpretations of future class material.
Delete